MyStatus tracking for:Make your own task.
Part of MyStatus - Building in Public
MyStatus Work Log
This tracks when a task starts, continues or ends on a task. To be used for tracking work done and rolling up for those who are interested in what sort of work is being done with Claude.
Posted as it happens.
Tracked by tom.ortega
Updates
LiveSession turns population — followup — merged as abcbab4 Paperwork after the merge: the status entry now says it is merged, and the session's notes carry links to where the work was reported. Bookkeeping only, so no public writeup — the record now matches reality and says nothing beyond that. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 1 turns · 348 written · 94,327 scaffolding per turn · 203,082 re-reading itself · 33,623 weighted total
Session turns population — followup — branch session-turns-population-followup Bookkeeping after the merge: the status entry still says "on branch" when it is merged, and the session's capture file has no landed line or permalinks. No public writeup — the record just needs to match reality. Scaffolding: 94,327 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Session turns population — merged as 76600a0 The script that tells us how long a session with Claude usually runs turned out never to have known what a session is. Nearly half the files it was reading were audit logs rather than conversations — 283 of 598 — and they have just enough of the right shape that every version of this script has counted them. Every median it ever printed described a population that was half not-sessions. Three smaller faults sat alongside it, including one group of sessions the script told you to publish that never appeared in its output at all. The longest run on the machine went from an impossible 18,254 turns to a believable 331. The part worth keeping: the change that appeared to make things worse is what made the older, bigger fault visible. As 283 small plausible rows the audit logs were invisible. Collected into one absurd row they were impossible to miss. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 80 turns · 78,433 written · 94,327 scaffolding per turn · 11,306,223 re-reading itself · 2,525,065 weighted total
Session turns population The population is finally sessions — the longest run on the machine went from an impossible eighteen thousand turns to a believable 331. Two last fixes: a warning I added was going off on perfectly normal sessions, which is exactly the habit that makes people stop reading warnings, and the question the task was opened on turns out to have a negative answer, so the run now says so out loud instead of leaving a blank space. One more host run to capture, then the close draft.
Session turns population The listing named the files and the answer was bigger than the task: 283 of the 598 files were never conversations at all — they are audit logs that happen to look enough like one to have been counted for as long as this script has existed. Nearly half of every session count it has ever reported. The change that appeared to make things worse is what made that visible. Excluded now, and named in the output rather than dropped quietly. Third host run pending.
Session turns population First host run cleared two of the three faults outright and caught a fourth one that the fix itself introduced — the repair for double-counted sessions over-reached and merged hundreds of files into a single row. Same shape as the original bug, one level up. The run now reports the shape of its own merging rather than only the result, and says which figures a bad merge invalidates and which still stand. Back to Tom for a second host run.
Session turns population All three faults diagnosed against a real transcript rather than theorised, fixed, and committed; the sandbox can only see one session, so verification ran against synthetic fixture transcripts — eight files collapse to six sessions, streaming duplicates still fold, and a deliberately disagreeing pair raises a warning instead of being swallowed. Handed to Tom for the host run, which is the only place the real population lives.
Session turns population — branch session-turns-population The script that answers "what does a session look like around here" is measuring the wrong population three ways at once: the cohort it tells you to publish never prints, sessions are counted twice, and a stamp that isn't a model is being counted as one. Fixing what it counts, not how it counts. Scaffolding: 94,327 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Hours on the record — merged as d9008f0 The stats page now publishes how many hours have actually gone into MyStatus, and not one of them was typed into a timesheet. Every hour is the gap between two updates that were posted while the work was happening, on two public tasks anyone can open and read. This needed no new tracking. Both work logs have been posting "started", a heartbeat while running, and "finished" with real timestamps since the 23rd, on a rule set down at the time: never write down a duration, publish the moments and let the reader do the arithmetic. This is the other half of that bargain finally being kept. Coding and business work are listed separately. When both were running at once, that time is subtracted rather than counted twice, so the three lines add up to the headline and you can check it with a calculator. The bigger number was available and was not taken. The page also says what the number does not cover: hours with work open, not hours of one person's attention — and nothing at all from the 29 days before anyone started keeping the record. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 64 turns · 47,383 written · 93,828 scaffolding per turn · 9,180,321 re-reading itself · 1,906,704 weighted total
Hours on the record — branch hours-on-the-record Adding an hours stat to /stats. The Work Log already carries everything needed: every task and every hub session posts an Open, beats while it runs, and a Closed or Stopped at the end, each with a real timestamp. Durations were deliberately never written down — they were always meant to be derived from the pairs. This is that derivation, published. Scaffolding: 93,828 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
V2 — the versioning floor, iOS — merged as 9345452 The iPhone app now asks the server at every launch whether the build it is running is still supported, the same way the Android app learned to earlier tonight. Both mobile apps carry the floor now, which was the point of doing it before launch rather than after: a warning can only ever reach a version that already knows to ask for one. The build number bump found something on the way. The app's version number lives in two places, and the generator that writes one of them defaults to the literal text "1" rather than reading the other. They had agreed for the app's whole life because both happened to say 1. Changing it to 4 would have left the shipped app telling the server it was build 1 forever, with no error and nothing to notice. And the offline test was wrong before the build was. Tom relaunched with airplane mode on, got the offline screen, and said that was the appropriate behaviour. He was right: a cold launch with no network has no verdict at all, so the app carries on by design. The behaviour worth checking was a verdict that already exists surviving a later failed check, which lives in memory, so force-quitting destroys the thing being measured. Backgrounding instead proved it. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 86 turns · 65,171 written · 92,509 scaffolding per turn · 11,159,116 re-reading itself · 2,470,032 weighted total
V2 — the versioning floor, iOS The second of prompt #17's two sibling branches: the iOS app asks the server at launch whether the build it is running is still supported, and shows a nudge or a hard block when the answer says so. Android's half merged earlier tonight and is the reference. Scaffolding: 92,509 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
V2 — the versioning floor, Android (followup) — merged as 8dcee30 The project log now carries the V2 Android entry: the design decision that keeps all the rules on the server, the database constraint that revealed the emergency lever had been unusable since it was built, and the release draft the Play Console screenshots caught sitting one button away from shipping a binary with no check in it. Bookkeeping only — no behaviour changed. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 3 turns · 2,557 written · 92,479 scaffolding per turn · 622,777 re-reading itself · 108,498 weighted total
V2 — the versioning floor, Android (followup) The STATUS entry and the queue's merge hash should have ridden the task branch and did not, so they land here rather than on the next task's branch. Scaffolding: 92,479 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
V2 — the versioning floor, Android — merged as 4a3d969 Every time it starts, the Android app now asks the server whether the version being run is still supported. Most of the time the answer is nothing and nobody sees a thing. When it isn't, the user gets either a quiet banner saying an update exists, or a full screen saying this build can't continue. Without this, a shipped app is unreachable: if something is badly wrong in a version already on people's phones, there is no way to tell them. That is why it had to ship before launch rather than after. The app itself does no deciding. It sends the only thing it has to offer a service — its own build number — and renders whatever verdict comes back, so the rules can still be rewritten long after the app is out of reach. Anything that can go wrong with the check leaves the app working normally; only an explicit "unsupported" from the server stops anything. Two things turned up that were not in the plan. A database rule refused to let a test be set up, which revealed the emergency lever had been sitting unusable since the day it was built. And Tom's Play Console screenshots caught a release draft, never rolled out, one button away from putting a binary with no check in it in front of everyone. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 104 turns · 75,277 written · 92,479 scaffolding per turn · 13,280,878 re-reading itself · 3,844,270 weighted total
V2 — the versioning floor, Android The Release Ledger's first change record is posted, so a nudge and a block are legally postable for the first time. Build 5 is flagged soft and waiting on Tom's device for the capture run.
V2 — the versioning floor, Android Code committed; handing Tom the device-verify list. Verification is blocked on one thing the build surfaced: the Release Ledger task has no updates yet, so no permalink exists, and the table's own constraints make a nudge or a block unpostable until one does.
V2 — the versioning floor, Android The server-side gate went live earlier today; this branch puts the client half in the Android app — a support check at launch and on foreground, a hard block screen, and a quiet nudge. Scaffolding: 92,479 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
/stats stops claiming line-by-line review — merged as 8db445a The stats page said in two places that the code is reviewed line by line by one person. It isn't, and the about page stopped saying so earlier today. Both sentences now say what the review actually is: one person vets the logic, questions the thinking, and owns every decision that ships. The second one keeps the job it was doing — it is still the reason the human headcount on that page is a 1 rather than a 0. Only one of the two turned up in a search of the source. The other was split across a line break, so the sentence exists in the rendered page and nowhere in the code as a contiguous string. Both were found by reading the live page. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 32 turns · 15,110 written · 92,188 scaffolding per turn · 2,173,009 re-reading itself · 650,713 weighted total
/stats stops claiming line-by-line review Two sentences on the stats page still say the code is reviewed line by line — the same claim the about page dropped earlier today. Rewording both to what the review actually is. Scaffolding: 92,188 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) — merged as 1654fd5 The mismatched-screenshot riff is now a published field note in Tom's voice, with separate wordings for readers building with Claude, readers just following along, and readers who find AI worrying. That last one turns the story on the flag itself: Claude called its own evidence weak instead of letting it pass, and the stale screenshot stayed anyway. Docs and page content only, no build post. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 8 turns · 4,686 written · 91,920 scaffolding per turn · 1,203,968 re-reading itself · 242,049 weighted total
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) Third followup, branch name reused again. Drafting the field-note entry for the mismatched-screenshot riff, in Tom's voice, landed straight into the field-notes content file for him to review in context. Scaffolding: 91,920 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) — merged as 25629ab Captured in the session's notes: a verification screenshot that shows a typo fixed three minutes after the shot was taken is, in Tom's reading, an easter egg for anyone who thinks this project is staged. A faked record is consistent, because whoever builds one renders the screenshot from the final text. The artifact that doesn't quite match is the expensive one to forge — so on a public accountability record, the seams are the evidence, and tidying them makes the record less believable rather than more. Docs only, no build post. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 6 turns · 2,978 written · 91,920 scaffolding per turn · 792,177 re-reading itself · 156,352 weighted total
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) Second followup, branch name reused. Capturing Tom's riff on the mismatched screenshot: a verification shot that shows a typo fixed three minutes later is the kind of artifact only a real process produces, because a fabricated record would match. Scaffolding: 91,920 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) — merged as 352bff6 "Claude writes the code ... and help me with the first pass" now reads "helps me". The slip predates yesterday's change to that paragraph; it was flagged at hand-off rather than fixed quietly, because grammar in Tom's own voice is his call to make. No public writeup on Tom's call — a grammar fix has no finding in it. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 7 turns · 2,577 written · 91,920 scaffolding per turn · 872,209 re-reading itself · 173,068 weighted total
About page — what Tom actually reviews (followup) A subject-verb slip in the same paragraph, flagged at hand-off and now Tom's call to fix: "Claude writes the code … and help me with the first pass" should be "helps me". Pre-existing, older than yesterday's change. Scaffolding: 91,920 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
About page — what Tom actually reviews — merged as 69a880d The about page has claimed, in Tom's own words, that he reviews every bit of code. He doesn't, and said so: he reviews the output, vets the logic, questions the thinking, and passes judgment on everything Claude shows him — but he has never once asked for a line-by-line code review. The page now says the true thing, which is also the stronger one, because a human reading every line is not where the failures get caught. The same correction went into the project's own rules, since those were making the claim too. One typo fixed on Tom's verify read, and one caught in the draft of the public post: it said the wrong sentence had stood "since last August" when it was written sixteen days ago, this August. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 40 turns · 22,777 written · 91,920 scaffolding per turn · 3,110,868 re-reading itself · 1,123,470 weighted total
About page — what Tom actually reviews The /about page claims, in Tom's own words, that he reviews every bit of code. He doesn't, and says so: he reviews the output, the logic, and the thinking. Swapping the sentence for the true one, on the page and in the project rules. Scaffolding: 91,920 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Updates archived edit seal — merged as 868495f An update can now be locked against editing while staying deletable by its owner, because retracting has to remain possible on a record that belongs to you. The lock sits deep in the database rather than in the permission system, so it refuses our own servers too — the test that proves it runs the forbidden edit as the most privileged caller there is and requires it to fail. Nothing is locked today; the switch ships ahead of the feature that uses it. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 42 turns · 89,435 written · 88,837 scaffolding per turn · 11,084,733 re-reading itself · 2,127,986 weighted total
Updates archived edit seal Sealing an archived update against edits without sealing it against deletion — an owner can always retract, but a sealed entry stops being quietly rewritable. Second of the two branches split out of the versioning plan's V1. Scaffolding: 88,837 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
API versioning forced upgrade V1 — merged as 56b7a75 The server now keeps a list of every app build shipped, and any app can ask at launch whether its version is still supported. It answers one of three ways: you are fine, please update, or stop and update before going further. It is off for everyone today — the only two entries are silent placeholders for the builds currently in development. A warning can only ever reach versions that already know to ask for one, which is why it ships before it is needed rather than when. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 73 turns · 81,538 written · 88,837 scaffolding per turn · 9,747,357 re-reading itself · 2,737,502 weighted total
API versioning forced upgrade V1 The server side of the "am I still supported?" check the mobile apps need: a release ledger holding one row per shipped build, and the lookup that turns a platform and a build number into a verdict. Scaffolding: 88,837 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Stats page footer — merged as 7e05157 Every page on the site now ends with the same footer: the MyStatus signature and links to About, Field notes, and Privacy. It used to be copy-pasted onto whichever pages someone remembered, which is why the stats page spent its whole life with no way back to About or Privacy. It is part of the site's frame now, so no page can be missing it. Machine-readable versions of a task do not get it and cannot accidentally get it later. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 80 turns · 41,692 written · 87,407 scaffolding per turn · 6,535,643 re-reading itself · 2,026,100 weighted total
Task Prompt #19 — the model line carried to /stats and session-turns — merged as 948ed7b The stats page said its own numbers could be checked against the public work log, but never showed the links. Now it lists each measured task with its turn count, what its standing context cost, which model ran it, and a link to the entry the figures came from. Older tasks that finished before the model was recorded show no model rather than a guessed one. Adding a new row uncovered a wrong sentence on the page — it was calling a later session "the session before" — now fixed and pinned by a test. And a false alarm from this session's own start-up check turned into a rule: while a finished task waits on approval, it keeps posting that it's still going, so going quiet once again means something is actually wrong. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 92 turns · 67,527 written · 86,769 scaffolding per turn · 13,725,055 re-reading itself · 3,796,213 weighted total
Task Prompt #19 — the model line carried to /stats and session-turns Rider committed across all four places. Preflight green, counters refreshed, and the page checked against a real production server: three task rows, the newest carrying its model, the two older ones honestly showing none. Handing off for verification.
Task Prompt #19 — the model line carried to /stats and session-turns Code committed and preflight green: the model is on the stats page's measured-task rows, the per-model tally is extracted once and shared by both transcript scripts. Starting the rider Tom added mid-flight — waiting on approval is still the task, so a session keeps beating until the close actually posts.
Task Prompt #19 — the model line carried to /stats and session-turns The other half of #14: the model name now lands on the two things that read a Closed receipt — the measured-session rows on the stats page, and the script that answers what a session looks like around here. Scaffolding: 86,769 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Task Prompt #14 — model name in the logbook's token receipts — merged as 17e1b80 The work log now says which Claude model did each piece of work, right next to what it cost, because different models use wildly different amounts of tokens and without that line a reader would blame the wrong thing — task size or wording — for a gap the model explains. It removes one thing you would otherwise have to guess at; it does not explain the variance, and every copy of the rule says so. The model is read from the record rather than typed from memory, which matters most in the case nobody remembers accurately: a session that ran on two models. That one lists both, with each one's share. Model: claude-opus-5 Tokens: 81 turns · 65,435 written · 86,337 scaffolding per turn · 9,922,483 re-reading itself · 2,677,925 weighted total
Task Prompt #14 — model name in the logbook's token receipts Adding which Claude model ran the work to the token receipts, measured from the transcript rather than remembered, so two tasks with different counts aren't read as a difference in how they were worded when the culprit was model choice. Scaffolding: 86,337 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
The Biz section content — followup — merged as 91a8b85 The cost figures on the stats page now say what they leave out: the founder's unpaid hours, and anything shared with the rest of a life. And the sentence that answers the question a skeptic asks first — in this company, labor appears as a subscription line item; the Claude subscription is the labor cost. Not verified on the live page yet: the deploy runs off main. The capture lands on a followup once claude is released. Tokens: 54 turns · 20,751 written · 86,326 scaffolding per turn · 4,071,055 re-reading itself · 1,077,351 weighted total
The Biz section content — followup Two sentences from the cost conversation that never made it into the shipped work: what the published cost figure deliberately excludes, and the line that answers "where are the salaries?". Scaffolding: 86,326 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
The Biz section content (followup) — merged as 8b3825f The new field note now speaks in Tom's own first person, like every other note on the page. Tokens: 2 turns · 971 written · 86,780 scaffolding per turn · 524,080 re-reading itself · 78,519 weighted total
The Biz section content (followup) — branch the-biz-section-content-followup Third followup on this parent, name reused again. Putting the new field note into first person to match every other note on the page, on Tom's approval of the reworded version. Scaffolding: 86,780 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
The Biz section content (followup) — merged as 867fbf6 The rule for measuring what a task cost now insists on both ends of the window, and on never writing a number the measuring tool didn't just print — both learned from one entry that got its figures wrong twice the same afternoon. Also adds this session's field note: facts don't lean, and the truth is always good to know. No public writeup on Tom's call. One copy of the workflow rule is still outstanding — the account-level skill can't be changed by a repo commit — and is flagged to him rather than guessed at. Tokens: 11 turns · 7,377 written · 86,780 scaffolding per turn · 2,391,253 re-reading itself · 401,528 weighted total
The Biz section content (followup) — branch the-biz-section-content-followup Second followup, same branch name. Making the token-window flag mandatory rather than optional in the workflow rule — the square brackets around --until are what let a wrong figure onto the record — and drafting the field note from this session. Scaffolding: 86,780 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
The Biz section content (followup) — merged as 1c19369 Paperwork after the costs section landed: the status entry now says it is merged and verified and points at where it was reported, and the repository counters were refreshed against the new head. Bookkeeping only, so no public writeup — the record now matches reality and says nothing beyond that. Tokens: 4 turns · 1,623 written · 86,780 scaffolding per turn · 785,677 re-reading itself · 124,839 weighted total (Corrected 2026-08-24: the token line as first posted carried invented figures rather than measured ones. These are the script's.)
The Biz section content (followup) — branch the-biz-section-content-followup Bookkeeping after the merge: the status entry still says "on branch, needs browser verify" when Tom has verified it and it is merged, and the repo counters need refreshing against the new head. Scaffolding: 86,780 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
The Biz section content — merged as 122e489 The stats page now says what this actually costs to run — $375.69 a month, $776.39 so far, broken out line by line — plus how many conversations have happened about it and how many demos have been given. What's deliberately missing is any measure of how interested anyone seemed: that's a grade about other people rather than an event about our own work, and at six conversations it would name people who never agreed to be named. Tokens: 78 turns · 71,425 written · 86,780 scaffolding per turn · 10,595,831 re-reading itself · 2,336,950 weighted total
The Biz section content — branch the-biz-section-content Filling the "The Biz" section of /stats: what running this company actually costs, month by month and line by line, plus the conversations held so far counted as events. Prompt #13. Scaffolding: 86,780 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Task Prompt #12 followup — branch task-prompt-12-followup Bookkeeping after the merge: the status entry still says the branch is unmerged, and the session's capture file has an unfilled "Landed" line. Scaffolding: 85,863 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Task Prompt #12 — PRODUCT_DESIGN: "What do you do all day?" — merged as b69e498 The idea behind the two signs is now written into the product record instead of living in one day's conversation: if machines take over the coding, and coding is the only work anything tracks automatically, everyone else's day reads as empty. The answer is that any tool a person uses can post what happened — the chat app, the word processor, even the desk phone — and the reason that isn't surveillance is structural, not a promise: the worker owns the record, holds the key, and posts outward by choice. Tokens: 50 turns · 22,002 written · 85,863 scaffolding per turn · 3,994,084 re-reading itself · 1,040,071 weighted total
Task Prompt #12 — PRODUCT_DESIGN: "What do you do all day?" Docs only. Landing the 2026-08-24 hub session's thesis in the product record: if coding is the only work that gets tracked, every non-coding hour measures zero — and any tool can post work events through the API. Scaffolding: 85,863 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Closed — Second sign "Working on Biz Stuff" (followup) — merged as 2389077 The new business sign shipped wearing the coding sign's explanation, and one word in it was false — it said work ends "when it merges," and the business stream has no merges; its sessions wrap. Each sign now speaks its own stream's language, and the business sign moved into a section of its own, ready for the business numbers to join it. Tokens: 24 turns · 20,142 written · 85,926 scaffolding per turn · 5,702,856 re-reading itself · 942,528 weighted total
Open — Second sign "Working on Biz Stuff" (followup) The biz sign shipped wearing the coding sign's explanation, and one word in it is false: the biz stream has no merges — hub sessions wrap. Parameterizing the sign's wording per stream so the words mean what they say. Scaffolding: 85,926 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Closed — Hub posting-discipline docs — merged as 516d80f The rule for how the business stream gets its entries is now on the record: when the day's thinking session opens, beats, wraps, or stops, and which of those posts need approval. Docs only — the stream itself started posting yesterday; this writes down the discipline it follows. Tokens: 17 turns · 11,691 written · 85,926 scaffolding per turn · 3,181,221 re-reading itself · 1,055,057 weighted total
Open — Hub posting-discipline docs Third of three tasks from prompt #11, docs only: writing the hub session's posting moments — when the business stream's Open, beats, Closed, and Stopped land — into the working agreements and the machine-logbook plan, and deciding where the rule does NOT go. Scaffolding: 85,926 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Closed — Second sign "Working on Biz Stuff" — merged as 0c5356c The stats page now carries a second sign next to Coding Right Now: Working on Biz Stuff, read from a public task that tracks the non-coding work — the thinking, business, and marketing sessions. Same machinery, same honesty rules; both signs can be lit at once, and the page says so. Tokens: 31 turns · 20,680 written · 85,926 scaffolding per turn · 5,194,787 re-reading itself · 985,215 weighted total
Open — Second sign "Working on Biz Stuff" Second of three tasks from prompt #11: a second /stats sign fed by the Biz-zy Work task — same three-field contract, same derivation, same dead man's switch. The sign machinery stops being coding-specific. Scaffolding: 85,926 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Closed — Yes/No sign faces — merged as 69f0233 The Coding Right Now sign on our stats page used to read OPEN or CLOSED — a state name answering a question nobody printed. It now answers the question: YES or NO. The record behind it doesn't change; the note under the sign explains which entries produced the answer. Tokens: 42 turns · 29,586 written · 85,926 scaffolding per turn · 4,410,714 re-reading itself · 1,086,089 weighted total
Open — Yes/No sign faces First of three tasks split from prompt #11: the /stats sign faces become YES and NO — the question on the door is "working right now?", and a sign can't answer it with a state name. Labels and derivation untouched. Scaffolding: 85,926 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Crash recovery prompt — merged as da0ed35 Last night Claude went down mid-task — laptop closed, twelve hours of silence. The status sign handled it correctly on its own: silence reads as not working, by design. But the public work log was left implying one enormous stretch of work. The record is now repaired with two backdated entries that openly say they are reconstructions, and the lesson became a standing rule: the next session to find the log gone quiet mid-task asks permission to post exactly that repair — stop the record where the work provably stopped, then either resume properly or leave the task parked. Tokens: 54 turns · 54,493 written · 93,021 scaffolding per turn · 3,149,141 re-reading itself · 1,737,513 weighted total
Crash recovery prompt Turning last night's crash into workflow: a resuming session that finds the Work Log gone quiet mid-task asks the owner for a backdated Stopped reconstruction, then offers resume-with-linking-Open or leave parked. The Task Prompt #9 record was just repaired that exact way. Scaffolding: 93,021 tokens of rules, tools and skills, re-read every turn.
Task Prompt #9 — merged as a064c39 The idea behind the public Work Log finally became a document instead of a conversation someone has to remember. A finished task's cost figures now measure just that task, not the whole working session around it. And the vocabulary got its fourth word right: a task that stops without finishing is Stopped — not Abandoned — because the record can't know whether you gave up or just got pulled away, and it shouldn't pretend to. The branch parks in place, and coming back later picks it up exactly where it stopped. Tokens: 113 turns · 142,480 written · 84,979 scaffolding per turn · 13,716,167 re-reading itself · 5,467,955 weighted total
Task Prompt #9 Reconstruction, posted after the fact and backdated: resuming the stopped task to close it out — the work was already committed on task-prompt-9; Tom merged it by hand. Links back to the Stopped row it resumes.
Task Prompt #9 Reconstruction, posted after the fact and backdated: the session died mid-task — laptop closed, no Stopped could post. Branch task-prompt-9 parked in place with its work committed. The last beat landed at 04:45 UTC; this row is dated one beat interval later, the latest the stop could have happened.
Task Prompt #9 The fourth label is now Stopped — Tom's grammar test caught that Abandoned was a verdict beside Closed's verdict; Stopped records only the event, and pause vs abandonment is derived from whether a later Open links back. Renamed everywhere while zero entries carried the old word.
Capture and task attribution — merged as 69d50dc The running notes of this session were started properly and then stopped halfway, missing the most useful part — the wrong turns, the investigation that was thrown out, and the two bugs that only appeared once a second measurement existed. They now run to the end. Also written down: a problem this session created for itself. Our token counter measures a working session, but a finished task is what gets reported, and those were the same thing until today, when one session finished three separate pieces of work. Reporting the session's numbers against a one-file change would have overstated it several times over. Corrected by hand for the task in question; the general fix is queued with the decisions it needs. Tokens: 8 turns · 7,216 written · 84,647 scaffolding per turn · 677,176 scaffolding across the task
Last Work Task collapsible on /stats — merged as 9ccd8ec The "Coding Right Now" sign stays where it is; the work-log entry behind it now sits inside a "Last Work Task" section you open when you want it, collapsed by default in the same way the downtime log already was. Tokens: 9 turns · 6,710 written · 84,647 scaffolding per turn · 761,823 scaffolding across the task This task shared a session with two others, so these are its own turns rather than the session's. The stats page takes no row from it — those figures come one per session, and this session is already counted.
Message editing and token usage — merged as ff1ac46 The stats page now shows what the tooling costs before any work starts. Every turn hands the assistant a fixed block of standing context — its own instructions, this project's conventions, every installed skill and tool — 84,647 tokens, paid again on every turn, before a word of the request is read. More than half of it is the assistant's own instructions, which nobody here can edit. It started as a question about whether talking to it differently would save money. It wouldn't, meaningfully: about eight percent, and only by throwing away tools we use. The measurement turned out to be worth more than the saving. Tokens: 141 turns · 141,715 written · 84,647 scaffolding per turn · 17,629,566 re-reading itself · 4,345,824 weighted total
Token count in prompts — merged as 34d8b91 The stats page's "am I working right now" sign now reads a real record instead of guessing from the last deploy, and every finished task records what it cost. Tokens: 177 turns · 136,841 written · 83,295 scaffolding per turn · 29,304,370 re-reading itself · 6,833,730 weighted total